The Rule of Law in Action
Surety Bonds as a Nationwide Remedy for Justice
From local communities to nations and international bodies, laws govern civil conduct, shaping the fabric of societies that strive to remain just, civil, and morally upright. Justice systems, including courts, tribunals, and legal proceedings, interpret and enforce these laws when citizens file claims, pursue lawsuits, or seek criminal prosecution.
Yet, the integrity of these systems is under threat.
Across the United States, government actions are increasingly violating the sacred protections of the Bill of Rights and international human rights treaties, leaving citizens in every state grappling with the erosion of their freedoms.
Consider the revocation of religious exemptions for mandatory injectable biologic interventions, which forces individuals to choose between their faith and bodily autonomy. Reflect on legislative exemptions that shield pesticide and pharmaceutical conglomerates from lawsuits, even when their products cause harm or death, depriving Americans of their right to seek redress. Think about government agencies colluding with big tech to censor voices, stifling free speech in a digital age.
These violations strike at the heart of the First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as treaties like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and the Convention against Torture (CAT), which hold equal weight to federal law under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
For justice systems to fulfill their profound responsibility, they must remain free from corruption, adhere to ethical codes, and recuse judges or officials in cases of conflicts of interest. Above all, they must uphold inviolable principles, ensuring no individual, whether a national leader, corporate executive, or ordinary citizen, is immune from accountability. Yet, the non-self-executing nature of these international treaties blocks direct lawsuits, and constitutional claims often falter against immunity doctrines, leaving citizens without recourse.
The Threat of Legal Immunity and Moral Relativism
Moral relativism can obscure the path to justice, allowing subjective interpretations to justify violations of universal standards. Legal loopholes, such as presidential pardons or legislative protections, further erode the social contract.
When elected officials or powerful figures evade prosecution, the integrity of the judiciary as a pillar of governance suffers. No one should be above the law, yet legal precedents and political maneuvers have often allowed exactly that, destroying the foundation of equitable justice.
For instance, laws like the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shield pharmaceutical companies from liability, even when their products cause severe harm, depriving citizens of their Fourteenth Amendment right to seek redress. This state-enabled harm, which can lead to preventable deaths, also conflicts with ICCPR’s Article 6 (right to life) and CAT’s prohibition on cruel treatment, highlighting a systemic failure to uphold both domestic and international standards.
The Supremacy of International Law and U.S. Obligations
International law holds precedence over all subordinate legal systems, including local ordinances and national statutes. When domestic laws conflict with international humanitarian law, global citizens have a moral and legal duty to uphold the higher standard. The Nuremberg Principles, particularly Principle IV, affirm that individuals cannot escape accountability for unlawful acts by claiming they were following orders, ensuring personal responsibility for violations of international law. For Americans, this duty includes understanding the international covenants the United States has ratified, which, under the Supremacy Clause, become part of the "Supreme Law of the Land," carrying the same legal weight as federal statutes and constitutional provisions.
The U.S. has ratified several key treaties that intersect with the Bill of Rights. The ICCPR, signed in 1977 and ratified in 1992, protects rights like free speech, religion, and fair trials, aligning with the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. CERD, ratified in 1994, obligates the U.S. to eliminate discrimination, complementing the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. CAT, also ratified in 1994, prohibits torture and cruel treatment, reinforcing the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, ratified in 1988, aligns with constitutional protections for life and liberty.
Despite their status as Supreme Law, U.S. reservations, such as non-self-executing declarations, mean citizens cannot directly sue for violations without implementing legislation, a limitation that ensures legislators can enact new laws that flagrantly avoid accountability at the detriment of the American people.
The Violations: A Direct Assault on Rights
Government actions across the U.S. reveal a pattern of violations that demand action.
Legislative exemptions for corporations, such as pesticide and pharmaceutical conglomerates, compound the harm. Laws shielding these entities from liability, even when their products cause injury or death, deprive Americans of their right to seek redress, a principle rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause and ICCPR’s Article 6. The Eighth Amendment’s implicit protection against state-sanctioned harm is also at stake, as preventable deaths from corporate negligence could be seen as state-enabled violations, conflicting with CAT’s standards.
Government collusion with big tech to censor Americans strikes at the core of the First Amendment and ICCPR’s Article 19. Reports of federal agencies pressuring social media platforms to suppress dissenting voices, such as those questioning medical interventions or corporate practices, reveal a coordinated assault on free expression. The Supreme Court has consistently upheld broad speech protections, as in Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015), and such censorship undermines the democratic principles enshrined in both domestic and international law.
The Legal Foundation: 18 U.S. Code § 242
A powerful legal tool to address these violations is 18 U.S. Code § 242, known as "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law." Highlighted by advocates like the Operation Freedom Channel during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, this federal statute makes it a crime for officials, acting under governmental authority, to willfully deprive individuals of constitutional or federal rights. It applies to federal, state, and local officials, with penalties including fines, imprisonment up to one year, or, if bodily injury or death results, harsher sentences, including life imprisonment.
A state health official revoking religious exemptions with the intent to override First Amendment rights could face charges under § 242, as could lawmakers granting corporate exemptions that lead to preventable deaths, violating due process and the right to life. Federal officials colluding with big tech to censor speech could be prosecuted for breaching First Amendment protections, provided their intent is proven, a high bar set by Screws v. United States (1945). While § 242 enables criminal accountability, it does not compensate victims or prevent future violations, highlighting the need for a broader remedy.
Surety Bonds: A Financial Incentive for Compliance
Surety bonds offer a practical, nationwide solution to enforce government accountability for these constitutional and treaty violations. A surety bond is a three-party agreement where a surety company guarantees that a principal fulfills obligations to an obligee, paying out if the principal fails and seeking reimbursement afterward. This model, used in federal construction projects under the Miller Act, can be adapted to ensure government compliance across the United States.
Imagine every government entity in any state required to post a surety bond guaranteeing adherence to constitutional and treaty standards. A bond could ensure compliance with the First Amendment and ICCPR by prohibiting the revocation of religious exemptions for medical interventions, with citizens as obligees who can file claims if their rights are violated. If a health department mandates vaccines without exemptions, affected individuals who’ve experienced disability or who’ve witnessed the death of their child as a result could claim against the bond, receiving compensation without facing immunity barriers or the non-self-executing treaty issue.
A bond could also target agencies granting corporate exemptions, ensuring compliance with the Fourteenth Amendment and ICCPR by holding them accountable for enabling harm, and compensating victims of corporate negligence. For censorship, a bond could guarantee First Amendment and ICCPR protections, allowing censored Americans to claim damages when agencies collude with tech giants. The surety would investigate, pay valid claims, and hold agencies financially accountable, creating a deterrent against future violations.
This approach is firmly rooted in constitutional law. A bond tied to the First Amendment could compensate individuals whose religious freedoms or speech are curtailed, building on precedents like Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye and Reed v. Town of Gilbert. A bond for Fourth and Eighth Amendment compliance could address bodily autonomy and state-enabled harm, as seen in Estelle v. Gamble (1976). The Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause, reinforced by ICCPR, could underpin bonds targeting corporate exemptions, ensuring access to justice.
By making agencies financially liable, bonds shift the burden from citizens to the government, ensuring that officials in any state face consequences for their actions.
The Office of the Inspector General: Amplifying Accountability
Surety bonds gain strength when paired with the investigative power of the Office of the Inspector General, an independent watchdog within federal agencies like the Department of Justice or Health and Human Services. OIGs probe waste, fraud, and misconduct, making them a vital partner in documenting violations that could trigger bond claims or support § 242 prosecutions. Citizens nationwide can file complaints with the relevant OIG when they suspect a government agency has violated their rights. A complaint to the HHS OIG about a federal policy revoking religious exemptions could cite First Amendment and ICCPR violations. A complaint to the DOJ OIG about agency collusion with big tech might reference First Amendment breaches, while a report on corporate exemptions could highlight Fourteenth Amendment and ICCPR violations.
An OIG investigation provides a detailed, impartial report that can serve as evidence for both bond claims and § 242 cases. For instance, an HHS OIG report confirming that a vaccine mandate lacked religious exemptions could substantiate a bond claim, prompting the surety to pay affected citizens. A DOJ OIG investigation into censorship, like the 2023 scrutiny of FBI interactions with social media platforms, could support a § 242 prosecution by proving intent, while enabling citizens to claim against a bond for compensation. Beyond evidence, OIG reports generate public pressure, often gaining media attention that shames agencies into reform and deters lawmakers from passing legislation that violates the Bill of Rights and International Covenants ratified under the Supremacy Clause.
Applying Treaties in Practice: A Call for Citizen Engagement
Understanding U.S.-ratified treaties empowers Americans to hold their government accountable to both international and constitutional standards. While non-self-executing, these treaties can inform legal arguments in court, especially when domestic laws fall short. For example, ICCPR’s free speech protections can support First Amendment challenges to censorship, while CERD can bolster Fourteenth Amendment claims against corporate-enabled discrimination, such as between the injected and non-injected, for example.
Citizens can also use treaty obligations to push for legislative or executive action, such as laws protecting religious exemptions or ensuring corporate accountability, by invoking U.S. commitments to treaties. These treaties reinforce constitutional protections, creating a synergy that strengthens domestic rights claims when government actions, like those outlined, conflict with universal standards.
The U.S.’s reservations and non-self-executing declarations limit direct enforcement, and the nation has not ratified other key treaties, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), further constraining its human rights commitments. Despite these challenges, citizens can advocate for implementing legislation to make ICCPR, CERD, and CAT enforceable in U.S. courts, following the model of historical campaigns like the Equal Rights Amendment. By studying these treaties and invoking them in public discourse, Americans can identify violations, resist unlawful orders as mandated by the Nuremberg Principles, and demand justice.
A Unified Path Forward
From rural towns to urban centers, Americans deserve a government that upholds the rule of obeying neither power nor money but the principles of justice. When officials revoke religious exemptions, shield harmful corporations, or censor speech, we must have a remedy. Surety bonds, paired with the investigative power of OIGs, offer a path forward for citizens in any state. They empower us to claim compensation for wrongs, hold agencies financially accountable, and deter lawmakers from eroding our rights. By rooting this solution in constitutional law, we ensure that no official, from a local health director to a federal agency head, stands above the law.
Take action today, no matter where you live.
File complaints with OIGs when agencies violate your rights, citing constitutional and treaty standards.
For Revoking Religious Exemptions for Injectable Biologic Interventions
This often involves health policies, such as vaccine mandates, overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).HHS OIG Hotline: Report fraud, waste, abuse, or misconduct related to HHS programs, including public health policies. File a complaint at https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/.
For Granting Corporate Exemptions from Lawsuits (Pesticide and Pharmaceutical Conglomerates)
This can involve HHS (for pharmaceuticals) or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for pesticides.HHS OIG Hotline: For pharmaceutical-related exemptions, use the same link as above: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/.
EPA OIG Hotline: For pesticide-related issues, report fraud, waste, or abuse at https://www.epa.gov/office-inspector-general/epa-oig-hotline (EPA OIG accepts complaints via an online form accessible through this page).
For Government Agencies Colluding with Big Tech to Censor Americans
This typically involves federal law enforcement or communication agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).DOJ OIG Hotline: Report misconduct by DOJ employees or programs, including censorship-related collusion, at https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/submit_complaint.php.
FCC OIG Hotline: For issues involving communication policies, file a complaint at https://www.fcc.gov/office-inspector-general#hotline (FCC OIG provides a form link on this page).
General Resource for Finding Other OIGs
If your complaint involves another agency, the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) provides a directory of all federal OIGs:CIGIE Inspectors General Directory: https://www.ignet.gov/content/inspectors-general-directory.
Use FOIA requests, to gather evidence of violations like censorship or corporate collusion.
General FOIA Resource to Identify the Right Agency
FOIA.gov is the central hub for FOIA requests, helping you identify the correct agency and submit requests.FOIA.gov Portal: Start your FOIA request or search for the right agency at https://www.foia.gov
For Revoking Religious Exemptions for Injectable Biologic Interventions
This often involves health policies, such as vaccine mandates, overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).HHS FOIA Public Access Link (PAL): Submit a request for HHS records, including those related to public health policies, at https://requests.publiclink.hhs.gov/App/Index.aspx.
For Granting Corporate Exemptions from Lawsuits (Pesticide and Pharmaceutical Conglomerates)
This can involve HHS (for pharmaceuticals) or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for pesticides.HHS FOIA Public Access Link (PAL): Use the same link as above for pharmaceutical-related exemptions: https://requests.publiclink.hhs.gov/App/Index.aspx.
EPA FOIA Online Request: File a request for pesticide-related records at https://foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/home (EPA uses this portal for submissions).
For Government Agencies Colluding with Big Tech to Censor Americans
This typically involves federal law enforcement or communication agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).DOJ FOIA Request Portal: Submit requests for DOJ records, including those related to censorship, at https://foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/home (DOJ uses this portal).
FCC FOIA Request via ArkCase: File a request for FCC records at https://www.fcc.gov/foia#request (follow the link to the ArkCase FOIA system).
Demand that Congress require bonds for agencies, ensuring compliance with the First Amendment’s promise of religious freedom and free speech, the Fourth’s shield against bodily intrusions, the Eighth’s stand against state-enabled harm, and the Fourteenth’s demand for justice.
House of Representatives Directory https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
Find your U.S. House representative by entering your address; access contact forms, phone numbers, and mailing addresses to urge them to support surety bond legislation.
U.S. Senate Directory https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm
Locate your U.S. Senators by state; use contact forms, phone numbers, or mailing addresses to demand congressional action on surety bonds for agency accountability.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Action Center https://www.eff.org/take-action
Find resources for advocacy campaigns, including letter-writing tools, to push for laws ensuring agency compliance with free speech and privacy protections via surety bonds.
Change.org Petition Platform
Start a petition calling for a Surety Bond Accountability Act, share it on social media with hashtags like #SuretyBondsForJustice to build public support for congressional action.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Town Hall Guide
https://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/town-hall-meetings
Offers guidance on organizing virtual or in-person town halls to raise awareness about surety bonds as a solution for constitutional violations by agencies.
Congressional Event Calendar https://www.congress.gov/event-calendar
Monitor upcoming congressional hearings and town halls to attend and advocate directly to lawmakers for legislation requiring surety bonds for agency compliance.
Join forces with civil rights groups to amplify these calls, drawing on 18 U.S. Code § 242 to pursue criminal accountability alongside financial remedies.
ACLU Action Center https://www.aclu.org/action
Access tools for collective action, including pre-drafted letters and petitions, which can be customized to advocate for surety bond legislation protecting constitutional rights.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Action Center https://www.eff.org/take-action
Provides tools for advocacy campaigns, including petitions and letter-writing templates, to push for laws protecting digital rights, free speech, and privacy, which can be adapted to support surety bond legislation.
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Action Center https://civilrights.org/take-action/
Provides resources for advocacy, including letter campaigns and petitions, to influence Congress on civil rights issues like equal protection and due process, supporting efforts to mandate surety bonds for constitutional compliance.
By fostering awareness and demanding accountability, we can rebuild trust in our justice systems, ensuring they reflect the highest standards of fairness and integrity. The path forward requires vigilance, courage, and an unwavering commitment to justice for all.
Like my content?
Support my work with Ko-Fi